Home / Knowledge / Kennametal KenTIP FS vs ISCAR SUMOCHAM
Kennametal KenTIP FS vs ISCAR SUMOCHAM
KenTIP FS and SUMOCHAM use replaceable carbide cutting units in reusable bodies. KenTIP FS centers on a front-side clamping interface and application-specific inserts, while SUMOCHAM offers a broad ecosystem of exchangeable heads and bodies.
Side-by-side comparison
| Category | Kennametal KenTIP FS | ISCAR SUMOCHAM |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | Front-side exchangeable insert designed for secure seating and in-machine changes. | Exchangeable carbide head locked into a reusable coolant-through body. |
| Geometry model | Insert styles are selected for material, hole quality and entry condition. | Multiple head geometries cover steels, stainless and exotic alloys, cast iron, aluminum and special entries. |
| Portfolio character | A compact Kennametal system positioned between solid carbide and indexable drilling. | A broad head-and-body family with miniature and deep-hole extensions. |
Best fit by application
Kennametal KenTIP FS
- Choose KenTIP FS when its clamping interface, insert geometry and Kennametal body range fit the process.
ISCAR SUMOCHAM
- Choose SUMOCHAM when broader point-geometry or body selection is more important.
Selection notes
KenTIP FS is the more compact system proposition; SUMOCHAM is the broader geometry ecosystem.
Variables to validate
- Consumables and bodies are proprietary; compare complete assemblies and equivalent depth ratios.
Official product references
We work to keep this information reliable, but specifications and availability can change. Verify critical details with the manufacturer through the official resources above.